← Library
Madras High CourtWP/3442/2015dismissed as infructuous

Rane Brake Lining Employees v. Government Of Tamil Nadu

2018-04-26Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :26.04.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.3442 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 Rane Brake Lining Employees Union Registration No.MDS/461/1972, Rep.by its General Secretary Mr.J.Srinivasan, Plot No.7/187, III Street, M.R.Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai-600 118.

...Petitioner

. Vs.

1.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Department of Labour and Employment, Fort.St.George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Asst. Commissioner of Labour, Conciliation Officer, Kuralagam, Chennai-600 104.

3.The Management of Rane Brake Linings Ltd., Rep.by its President, Plot. No.30, Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai-600 058.

4.R.manivannan 5.S.Kannan 6.G.Knakaraj 7.D.Gnanamoorthy 8.RBL Thozhilalar Sangam Regn.No.TVR/474, Plot No.30, 2nd Main Road, Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai 600 058.

... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to ascertain the true character of the 8th respondent and in particular investigate its origin, genuineness of its membership and whether it is the creature of the 3rd respondent and take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent and its officials for Unfair Labour Practice and further direct the 2nd respondent not to entertain the 8th respondent in any manner and in particular in the Conciliation Proceedings pertaining to the Wage Dispute raised by the petitioner, award costs.

For Petitioner : Ms.M.Ezhilarasi for Mr.K.Sudalai Kannu For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh for R 1 & 2 Additional Government Pleader Mr.Ravi for R 3 for M/s.Gupta & Ravi Mr.K.V.Ananthakrushnan for R 4 to R 8

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.

2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

-Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar

To 1.

The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Labour and Employment, Fort.St.George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Asst. Commissioner of Labour, Conciliation Officer, Kuralagam, Chennai-600 104.

3.The President, Management of Rane Brake Linings Ltd., Plot. No.30, Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai-600 058.

• 1 cc to Mr.Ravi & M/s.Gupta & Ravi, Advocate Sr.No.31663 • 1 cc Special Government Pleader Sr.No.32252 W.P.No.3442 of 2015 MR(CO) RRI 11/05/2018