Muthulakshmi Ammal v. Kannaian

C.M.P.No.11822 of 2020 in S.A.No.SR68514 of 2020 P.T.ASHA, J., The respondents 1 to 3 have been served through Government Pleader's office. Therefore, service is deemed to be complete on them.

The learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent has no objection to the delay being condoned.

Accordingly, the delay is condoned.

2. The Registry is directed to number the Second Appeal. The Registry is also directed to print the name of Mrs.R.Meenal, Ms.Indira and Mr.T.Sezhian at the time of admission.

31.08.2021 kan 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/