N.Kannappan, v. The Transport Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.11.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.34468 of 2015 N.Kannappan [ Petitioner ] Vs 1 The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai-05.

2 The Regional Transport Officer Poonammallee Chennai.

[ Respondents ] Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner dated 1.9.15 in form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of a Autorickshaw permit and consider the same.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Ramesh, AGP

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing in the morning on 29.10.2015, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was passed over. Again, when the matter was taken up for hearing in the afternoon on 29.10.2015, there was no representation for the second time. However, in order to give one more opportunity, the matter was directed to be listed next week. On 05.11.2015, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 17.11.2015. Even to day, though the matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rg https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1 The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai-05.

2 The Regional Transport Officer Poonammallee Chennai.

+ 1 cc to the Government Pleader Sr.59250 W.P.No.34468 of 2015 KK(CO) Eu 24.11.15 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/