P.Srinivasan v. T.Amuthan Anthony

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.2253 & 2594 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2012 C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.2253 of 2012 P.Srinivasan ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.T.Amuthan Anthony 2.Mrs.Jaya 3.N.Vaalarmurthy 4.Mangammal 5.Mrs.Susila 6.Mrs.Packivathy 7.Mrs.Suguna 8.Indira 9.S.Ramu 10.M.Elumalai 11.K.Govindswamy 12.A.Thirunavukkarasu 13.A.Madurai Muthu 14.E.Mohan 15.D.Doss 16.N.Jayaraman 17.A.Ramanathan 18.Velayudham 19.G.Dayalan 20.G.Mohana Krishnan 21.P.Seethalakshmi 22.G.Nageswaran 23.K.Roopuchandran 24.D.Prabhu ...

Respondents [R2 to R24 not necessary party and hence given up]

PRAYER IN CRP NPD No.2253 of 2012 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order passed by the trial court in I.A.No.48 of 2012 in O.S.No.3274 of 2008 on the file of Addl. District Judge and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court - V, Chennai.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Loganathan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 R2 to R24 - given up C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.2594 of 2012 1.G.Dayalan 2.G.Mohanakrishnan 3.P.Seethalakshmi 4.G.Nageswaran 5.K.Roobachandran ...

Petitioners Vs.

1.T.Amuthan Anthony 2.Mrs.Jaya 3.N.Vaalarmurthy 4.Mangammal 5.Mrs.Susila 6.Mrs.Packivathy 7.Ms.Suguna 8.Ms.Indra 9.S.Ramu 10.M.Elumalai 11.K.Govindsamy 12.A.Thirunavukkarasu 13.A.Madurai Muthu 14.E.Mohan 15.D.Doss 16.N.Jayaraman 17.A.Ramanathan 18.Srinivasan 19.Velayudham 20.D.Prabhu ...

Respondents

PRAYER IN CRP NPD No.2594 of 2012 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court - V, Chennai dated 16.04.2012 in I.A.No.48 of 2012 in O.S.No.3274 of 2008.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondents : No appearance for R1 to R11, R15, R17 & R20 Mr.R.Malaichamy for R12 & R13 Mr.C.Premkumar for R1 14 & R16 Mr.Loganathan for R18 Batta due for R19.

COMMON ORDER When the matters were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that pending the suit, the 1st respondent/plaintiff died and the suit was dismissed as abated.

2. In view of the above circumstances, nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petitions. In the result, both the Civil Revision

V.M.VELUMANI, J.

rgr Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to the parties to file a fresh petition and proceed further, if the suit is restored on to file.

No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

17.07.2017 Index : Yes/No rgr To The Addl. District Judge and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court - V, Chennai.

C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.2253 & 2594 of 2012