1. Thangavel S/O v. Sekar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:28.02.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.2164 of 2003 1.Thangavel 2.Velliammal ... Appellants /Defendants Vs.

Sekar

...Respondent/Plaintiff

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 06.03.2002 passed in A.S.No.30 of 2001 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Vridhachalam confirming the judgment and the decree dated 09.04.2001 passed in O.S.No.467 of 1989 before the Principal District Munsif's Court, Vridhachalam..

For Appellants : M/s.R.Meenal.

For Respondent : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

Counsel for the appellants present and reports that both the appellants are dead and also prays that the second appeal may be dismissed as abated an made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In the light of the above position, inasmuch as the appellants had died and no steps had been taken to proceed further in the matter, there is no purpose in keeping the second appeal further pending.

3.Resultantly, the second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Audit) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mfa https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam. 2.The Principal District Munsif, Vridhachalam. Copy TO The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate SR.No.15668 S.A.No.2164 of 2003 VD(CO) GN(23/03/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/