← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/16246/2020granted

Radha v. State Rep.By Its

2020-10-13Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.10.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.16246 of 2020 RADHA .. Petitioner Vs.

State rep by its The Inspector of Police, D3, Sooramangalam Police Station, Salem City.

Crime No.1369/2020 .. Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.1369 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Sooramangalam Police Station, Salem City.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Senthilkumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.1369 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant with wooden log, due to which, the defacto complainant sustained injuries on his hand and leg.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case due to wordy quarrel. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant with an wooden log, due to which, he sustained injuries. He would further submit that there is no previous case against the petitioner and the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by the learned counsels and also the fact that the injured has been discharges, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy was made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate- II, Salem, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

6.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 13/10/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SALEM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D3, SOORAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, SALEM CITY.

+1CC to M/S.M.SENTHILKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.6856 CRL OP.16246/2020 Date :13/10/2020 MK:20/10/2020