A.Salim@ Abdul Rahman v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 03.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.R.C.No.1243 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 1.A.Salim @ Abdul Rahman 2.A.Nazir Ahmed 3.M.Mohammed Kalimullah Sheriff 4.R.S.Musthaq 5.A.S.Akbar 6.A.S.Haroon 7.M.Mehaboob Basha 8.Mohammed Ismail

...Petitioners/Rev Petitioners

Vs.

1.The Sub-Divisional Magistrate and Sub-Collector, Tirupur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Tirupur North Police Station, 3.Nazar @ Abdul Raheem 4.Sait @ Mehaboob Basha 5.Zaheer Hussain 6.Kaja Nawaz 7.Syed Haroon 8.Jinnabai 9.Rafiq @ Mohammed Rafiq 10.Mohammed Saliq 11.Muthu @ Ismail 12.Shajahan 13.Shanawaz 14.Mohammed Umar 15.Aroon Batcha 16.Dabbi @ Mohamed Rafiq ... Respondents/Complainants PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case filed, filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, prayed to set aside the impugned summon issued under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. dated 22.11.2014 on the file of the 1st respondent.

For Petitioners: No appearance For Respondents: Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

J U D G M E N T

This Criminal Revision case is preferred against the summons issued by the 1st respondent for appearance of the petitioners to conduct enquiry on 22.11.2014, for offences under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code, before the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate,Tirupur.

2.

Heard, Mr.L.Baskaran, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents.

3.

As per the facts, the 1st respondent passed an order dated 22.11.2014, by invoking Sections 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which would be valid for a year. Based upon that, summon was sent on 22.11.2014 to the petitioners for appearing enquiry on 24.11.2014.

4.

As discussed above, the proceedings of the 1st respondent is valid for only one year. Against the issuance of the summons, the Criminal Revison Petition is filed in the year 2014 itself. Hence, the relief claimed by the petitioners in this revision has become infructuous.

5.

Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rri To 1.The Sub-Divisional Magistrate and Sub-Collector,

2.The Inspector of Police, Tirupur North Police Station, 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.R.C.No.1243 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 mg[co] srg 07/10/2021