Jothimurugan v. Inspector Of Police
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 379 r/w 341 of IPC in Crime No.75 of 2013, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused had stolen the batteries while installing cell phone towers at Thiruvannamalai District. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this is the second application for anticipatory bail. He would further submit that the petitioner was earlier granted anticipatory bail in Cr.No.2777 of 2023 dated 08.02.2023. However, the petitioner was unable to furnish sureties within a stipulated and thereby the earlier order got lapsed. Hence, the present petition and he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner along with other accused had stolen 24 batteries from the cell phone towers. However, he would further submit that the petitioner was earlier granted anticipatory bail in Crl.OP.No.2777 of 2023 and he was unable to execute sureties. Hence, he would vehemently oppose to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on records including the FIR.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, and the submissions made by both counsel and the petitioner has voluntarily come forward to execute sureties, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) as non-refundable deposit either through RTGS/NEFT or in cash in favour of " The Taluk Legal Service Authority attached to the Concerned Court" and on such deposit and
production of proof, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arani on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] Breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
[f] if the petitioner herein thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC. Vv 13.06.2023
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
Vv 13.06.2023