Sambath v. Arumugam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.12.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.(P.D.) No.3159 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.16039 of 2016

1. Sambath

2. Lokkiya

3. Kalliyappan

...Petitioners

versus

1. Arumugam

2. Thasildhar, Thasildhar Office, Ettapaddi Town and Taluk.

3.Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sankari.

4.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Salem.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and Decreetal Order of the learned District Munsif, Sankari, dated 03.06.2016 passed in I.A.No.1550 of 2014 in O.S.No.191 of 2014, thereby dismissing the application filed by the petitioner to implead themselves as defendants in the suit. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ajikumar for M/s.Sai Bharath and Ilan For 1st respondent : Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy For Respondents : No appearance 2 to 4

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J tsi

O R D E R

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the suit is settled out of court between the parties. Hence, the prayer in the revision petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.

Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

22.12.2016 Index:Yes/No tsi To The District Munsif, Sankari.

C.R.P.(P.D.) No.3159 of 2016

22.12.2016 http://www.judis.nic.in