D.Vijayasekaran v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA CRL.O.P.No.641 of 2015 D.Vijayasekaran ...

Petitioner

Versus

1. The Superintendent of Police,.

Tiruppur.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Udumalpet.

3. The Inspector of Police, Gudimangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.

...

Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., directing the respondents to extend the police protection to the life and liberty of petitioner and his family members based on the representation of petitioner, dated 01.12.2014.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.T.Shunmugarajeswaran Government Advocate (Crl.side)

O R D E R

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to extend police protection to the life and liberty of petitioner and his family members based on the representation of petitioner, dated 01.12.2014.

2. There is no representation for the petitioner. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, contended that the FIR is treated as mistake of fact and a Referred Charge Sheet also has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Udumalpet.

3. In view of the submission made by the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this petition stands dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 To

1. The Superintendent of Police,.

Tiruppur.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Udumalpet.

3. The Inspector of Police, Gudimangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.641 of 2015 GN(03/07/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/