B.Kishore v. J.Neetha

AS.No.379 of 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:

10.01.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN AS.No.379 of 2014 MP.No.1 of 2014 B.Kishore Appellant Vs J.Neetha Respondents Prayer:- This Appeal Suit is filed, under Section 96 of CPC, against the judgement and decree, dated 07.02.2014, made in OS.No.12 of 2005 (PoP.No.2 of 2004), by the Family Court Judge, Salem. For Appellant :

Mr.R.Bhaskaran for Mr.T.S.rajamohan For Respondent :

No Appearance JUDGEMENT (Judgement of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.) When the matter was taken up for consideration on an earlier occasion on 06.01.2023, there was no representation for the Appellant and hence, the matter was directed to be listed today, i.e. 10.01.2023, under the caption "for dismissal' and accordingly, the matter is posted today i.e. 10.01.2023, under the caption "for dismissal". When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the Appellant seeks further adjournment, despite 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

AS.No.379 of 2014 S.S.SUNDAR, J.

and A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.

Srcm the appeal being posted under the caption "for dismissal". As this Court finds no reason to adjourn this appeal further, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss this appeal suit for non prosecution. Accordingly, this Appeal Suit is dismissed, for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected MP is closed.

(S.S.S.R.J.) & (A.A.N.J.) 10.01.2023 Index:Yes/No Web:Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking Srcm To

1. The Family Court Judge, Salem

2. The Record Keeper, VR Section, High Court, Madras AS.No.379 of 2014 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis