M/S.Reliance Jio Infocomm v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.02.2015 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.S. RAMANATHAN CRL.O.P.Nos.654 & 655 of 2015 M/s. Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, having its Circle office at A1 Tower, 8th Floor, 89-90, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

rep. By its Legal Manager, Mr.D. Kalaimani.

...Petitioner in both CRL.OPs.

Vs.

1. The Inspector of Police, Tirupattur Town Police Station, Vellore.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupattur, Vellore District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District.

... Respondents in CRL.OP.No.654/2015

1. The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai Taluk Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents in CRL.OP.No.655/2015 Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions are filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to direct the respondents herein to provide the effective police protection to the petitioner's company to erect transmission tower at No.28/36, Chairman Ranganathan Street, Tirupattur, Vellore District and at SF.No.77/5, 77/6, 77/7A, Plot NO.14, Nochimalai Panchayat, Sambuvarayar Nagar, Tiruvannamali T.K.

For Petitioner in both CRL.OPs. : M/s. K. Govindarajan For Respondents in both CRL.OPs.: Mr.S. Shanmugavelayutham Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr. M. Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor

C O M M O N

O R D E R

1. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor though in the petition, the petitioner has enclosed a copy of the complaint along with the copy of the postal receipts, the respondents have not received any such complaint. He therefore, submitted that the petitioner may be directed to give a fresh complaint to the respondents and on receipt of such a complaint, the respondent will conduct enquiry. On being satisfied with the lease agreement with the owners, necessary police protection will be given to the petitioner.

2. Recording the submission of the learned Public Prosecutor, the petitions are disposed of directing the petitioner to give fresh complaint to the respondent enclosing a copy of the lease deed to establish their right to erect the tower in the property and the respondents are further directed to consider the representation. On being satisfied with the right of the petitioner to erect tower in those property, the respondents are directed to give police protection to the petitioner.

3. In the result, the criminal original petitions are disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar Dated:20.2.15 True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Inspector of Police, Tirupattur Town Police Station, Vellore.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupattur, Vellore District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai Taluk Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. 5.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District.

7. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+2 cc's to Mr.K.Govindarajan, Advocate,SR.7636 & 7635. +2 cc's to Public Prosecutor, SR.7437 & 7438. skv(co) krd 23/2 CRL.O.P.Nos.654 & 655 of 2015