Rajeswari v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.03.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Crl.O.P.No. 6610 of 2015

1. Rajeswari

2. M.Damodharan

...Petitioners

vs.

The State, rep. by Sub Inspector of Police, R.5, Virugambakkam Police Station, Chennai.

...Respondent

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the respondent/Police to register the complaint of the petitioners, dated 27.09.2014. For Petitioners: No appearance For Respondent : Mr.M.Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent-Police. No representation for petitioners. 2.

Considering the allegations made in the complaint and in view of the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in re Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & others reported in [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)] which has to be followed in letter and spirit viz., that if a cognizable offence is made out, the respondent-Police is duty bound to register a case, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, by directing the respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioners complaint, dated 27.09.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law.

sd -s/d- Assistant Registrar( ) Dt:1/4/2015 True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.

Sub Inspector of Police, R.5, Virugambakkam Police Station, Chennai.

2 The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

ppa(co) prk6/4 Crl.O.P.No. 6610 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/