Elumalai, M/39 (A1) v. The State Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Third day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice C.T.SELVAM and The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.4963 of 2018 IN CRL A.208/2018 ELUMALAI, [ PETITIONER/ACCUSED] Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANAPURAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI.

CR.NO.161 OF 2008.

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in Criminal APPEAL No.208 OF 2018 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to suspend the sentence passed in Judgment dated 09.12.2017 rendered by Sessions Judge Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruvannamalai in SC No.136 of 2009 and enlarge the petitioner on bail, pending disposal of the accompanying CRL.A.NO.208/2018.

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.A.No.208 of 2018 on the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.G.THIYAGU, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. R.PRATHAP KUMAR, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:- (Order of the Court was made by C.T.SELVAM, J) Petitioner was convicted for offence u/s.302 IPC and sentenced to undergo Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.2,000/- i/d 3 years R.I. by learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruvannamalai, under judgment dated 09.12.2017 in S.C.No.136 of 2009. Hence, petitioner seeks suspension of sentence.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the petitioner is confined at Central Prison, Vellore, and there are several infirmities and inconsistencies found in the prosecution case. It is contended that there are contradictions in the material particulars between the evidence of the prosecution witnesses. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has paid the fine

amount.

3. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioner.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that the petitioner has been in custody, that there are several infirmities in the prosecution case and there are arguable points involved in the appeal, as contended by learned counsel for petitioner, and further the appeal is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner herein is entitled to the relief of grant of suspension of sentence.

5. Accordingly, the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended and the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond in a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruvannamalai, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the said Court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. pending appeal.

-sd/- 03/10/2018 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE FAST TRACK MAHIL COURT, TIRUVANNAMALAI.

2 THE SESSIONS JUDGE, FAST TRACK MAHILA COURT, TIRUVANNAMALAI.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, VELLORE.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANAPURAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI.

+1 C.C. to M/S.P.G.THIYAGU Advocate on payment of necessary charges-Sr.18596 Order in CRL MP.4963/2018 in CRL A.208/2018 Date :03/10/2018 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format ths : 04.10.2018