T.Sarathammal, W/O.Late. v. The Superintendent Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.03.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Crl.O.P.No.6683 of 2015 T.Sarathammal

...Petitioner

vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Vengal Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

...Respondents

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the second respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 14.01.2015, and investigate the same and file final report within the stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Velu For Respondents: Mr.M.Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondentPolice. 2.

Considering the allegations made in the complaint and in view of the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in re Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & others reported in [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)] which has to be followed in letter and spirit viz., that if a cognizable offence is made out, the respondent-Police is duty bound https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

to register a case, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, by directing the second respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint, dated 14.01.2015, and investigate the same in accordance with law.

sd s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) Dt:26/03/2015 True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Vengal Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+ 1 cc to Mr.R.Velu,Advocate SR 15039 ts(co) prk26/3 Crl.O.P.No.6683 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/