V.Beemarav v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventh day of July Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.15610 of 2022 V.BEEMARAV [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AWPS VILLUPURAM, CR NO.47/2022 For Petitioner : M/S.G.TAMIL SELVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.DAMODARAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.06.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 376, 312, 294(b), 506(i) of IPC in crime No.47 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner promised to marry the victim girl and had sexual intercourse with her. Later, he refused to marry her. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that there are totally three accused, in which the petitioner is arrayed as A1. A3 is the mother of A1 and A2 is the brother of A1. He would further submit that on the pretext of marriage, the petitioner had sexual intercourse with the victim girl and thereafter he refused to marry her. He would also submit that A1 only has been arrested so far. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. It is seen that the petitioner fell in love with the victim girl and on the pretext of false marriage, they had physical relationship. He also compelled her to have physical relationship and thereafter, he refused to marry her. When it was questioned by the victim girl, all the family members threatened her and also had driven out her from their house. Therefore, the petitioner has committed very serious and heinous offence as against the victim girl and this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the criminal original petition is dismissed. -sd/- 07/07/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, VILLUPURAM 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AWPS VILLUPURAM.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.G.TAMIL SELVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.15610/2022 Date :07/07/2022 RVR 15/07/2022