Vennila, v. Govindaraj

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.01.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN CMA No.628 of 2007 Vennila ... Appellant vs.

Govindaraj ... Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi dated 17.10.2003 in HMOP No.31 of 1999.

For Appellant :

Mrs.Mythili Suresh for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.) The appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree in HMOP No.31 of 1999 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi. Under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, an appeal would lie to the District Court against the said judgment. Therefore, this appeal is not maintainable in this Court. Registry is directed to return the appeal to the learned counsel for the appellant to enable them to represent the same before the appropriate court. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

VRI To:

1 The Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi.

2 The Section Officer, VR, Section, High Court, Madras ks(CO) md(23/02/2017) CMA No.628 of 2007 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/