Lakshmi v. S. Rathinam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN S.A.No. 1074 of 2014 Lakshmi ...Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.

1.S.Rathinam 2.Varatharajan 3.Kanagavalli 4.N.Ramalingam @ Yezhumalai Gounder 5.N.Aruchamy @ Nalli Gounder

...Respondents/Defendants

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 01.03.2013 made in A.S.No. 94 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore, reversing the judgment and decree dated 20.08.2012 made in O.S.No. 132 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the SubOrdinate Judge, Pollachi. For Appellant : Mr.T.P.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu Mr.M.Sivavarthanan for R1 to R3 Mr.T.Nirmaleswar for R4 & R5

J U D G M E N T

Despite time having been granted, no steps have been taken. The counsel for the 4th respondent would submit that the appeal has been settled out of Court.

2. In view of the above statement and the failure on the part of the counsel for the appellant to take steps to bring on record the legal representatives of the 4th respondent, this appeal is dismissed as abated, leaving it open to the appellant to take steps as and when the particulars are received. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To:

1.The Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi.

2.The Principal District Court, Coimbatore.

S.A.No. 1074 of 2014 CP(CO) SP(09/02/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/