Kumaran v. The State Rep By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.15631 of 2022 1 KUMARAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 THIRUMALAI 3 DINAKARAN 4 MAYILVAGANAN Vs THE STATE REP BY ITS, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEPPANKUPPAM POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT CRIME NO.172 OF 2022.

For Petitioner : M/S.R.SASIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.DAMODARAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.172 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant and the petitioners are neighbours. Due to some previous enmity, wordy quarrel arose between them, due to that, the petitioners have abused and assaulted the defacto complainant and thereby, he has sustained injury. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against them. Hence, he prays for grant of Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that it is a case in counter and the victim got severe head injury and he is still in hospital and further the petitioners A1 and A2 are having three previous cases pending against them. Therefore, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that there are three previous cases as againt the petitioners, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners are very much required, this Court is not inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 06/07/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEPPANKUPPAM POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.R.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.15631/2022 Date :06/07/2022 RW-13/07/2022