← Library
Madras High CourtWP/8591/2004closed

I.V.Arputha Viji Jacinth v. The Government Of Tamil Nadu,

2017-07-17Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.07.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.8591 of 2004 and W.M.P.No.10088 of 2004 1.I.V.Arputha Viji Jacinth 2.K.Selvakumari .. Petitioners Vs.

1.Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-00 009.

2.The Director of Elementrary Education, College Road, Chennai-600 006.

3.The District Elementrary Educational Officer, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

4.The District Elementrary Educational Officer, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

5.The Additional Assistant Elementrary Officer, Alwar Thirunavagari Range @ Then Thiruperai, Tuticorin District.

6.The Correspondent, Ekaratchakar Sabai Middle School, Mukuperi and Post, Tuticorin District.

.. Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the orders of deployment passed by the third Respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No. 6573/B1/01, dated 20.2.2004, served on the petitioners on 25.3.2004, quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents 3, 5 and 6 to retain the petitioners as Secondary Grade Teachers in the 6th Respondent school with salary and other benefits.

For Petitioner :

Ms. Mahalakshmi For Respondents 1 to 5 :

Mr.M.Digvijayapandian Additional Government Pleader For Respondent-6 :

No appearance

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the orders of deployment passed by the third Respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No. 6573/B1/01 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents 3, 5 and 6 to retain the petitioners as Secondary Grade Teachers in the 6th Respondent school with salary and other benefits.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 5.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the deployment order passed by the 3rd respondent. While entertaining this Writ Petition, this Court by an order dated 01.04.2004 has granted interim stay if the petitioner is not relieved from the 6th respondent school.

4. Ms.Mahalakshmi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that already the petitioner has been relieved from the 6th respondent school on 24.3.2004. Hence, nothing survives in the Writ Petition and order challenged in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to make a representation to the authorities concerned for claiming benefits for the period worked under the 6th respondent school.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed as nothing survives. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar uma

To 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-00 009.

2.The Director of Elementrary Education, College Road, Chennai-600 006.

3.The District Elementrary Educational Officer, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

4.The District Elementrary Educational Officer, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

5.The Additional Assistant Elementrary Officer, Alwar Thirunavagari Range @ Then Thiruperai, Tuticorin District.

+1 cc to M/s.P.Mahalakshmi Advocate sr 49939 +1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 50145 +1 cc to M/s.Ajmal Associates sr 49791 W.P.No.8591 of 2004 and W.M.P.No.10088 of 2004 nm(co) aa09/08/2017