Tmt.Sumathi v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.02.2019

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.3240 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 1.Sumathi 2.Muralidharan 3.Elumalai 4.Thanikachalam 5.Sakthivel

...Petitioners

Vs.

The State, represented by, The Inspector of Police, New Town Police Station, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

(Crime No.605 of 2006).

...Respondent

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in C.C.No.21 of 2007 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, II, Cuddalore and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor.

ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the proceeding in C.C.No.21 of 2007 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, II, Cuddalore, thereby taken cognizance for the offences under Section 147, 341, 323, 427 and 506(ii) of IPC.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the proceedings in C.C.No.21 of 2007 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Cuddalore was ended in acquittal. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Recording the said submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rts To

1. The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Cuddalore 2.The Inspector of Police, New Town Police Station, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.3240 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 RR(CO) GMY(28/03/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/