← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/3327/2016dismissed

S.Manimaran v. Raheema Bibi

2016-10-26Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Sasidharan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.10.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(P.D.) Nos.3327 and 3328 of 2016 and CMP.Nos.15679 and 15680 of 2016 S.Manimaran

...Petitioner in both CRPs

versus 1.Raheema Bibi 2.Noorunnisha 3.M.S.Sadiq 4.M.S.Thahir 5.M.S.Raffi

...Respondents in both CRPs

PRAYER in CRP(PD) No.3327/2016: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 24.02.2016 in I.A.No.75 of 2015 in R.C.A.CFR No.5017 of 2015 on the file of Principal Sub-Judge, Coimbatore.

PRAYER in CRP(PD) No.3328/2016: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 24.02.2016 in I.A.No.76 of 2015 in R.C.A.CFR No.5013 of 2015 on the file of Principal Sub-Judge, Coimbatore.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Subramanian

C O M M O N O R D E R The interlocutory application filed by the petitioner to condone the delay in filing the statutory appeal is under challenge in CRP (Pd)No.3327 of 2016. Similarly, the order dismissing the application to condone the delay of 114 days in filing the appeal is under challenge in CRP (Pd) No.3328 of 2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. These civil revision petitions are connected to the revision petitions disposed of by this Court by order dated 30.09.2016 in CRP (Pd) Nos.3074 and 3075 of 2016. This Court directed the Trial Court to decide the admissibility and relevancy of the document marked as exhibit. In view of the order passed by this Court disposing the revision petitions in CRP (Pd) Nos.3074 and 3075 of 2016, there is no question of interfering with the order passed by the Trial Court declining to condone the delay. The order passed by this Court, dated 30 September 2016 would cover the issue raised by the petitioner before the Trial Court pertaining to which the present revision petitions are filed.

4. In the result, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 26.10.2016 Index:Yes/No svki To The Principal Sub-Court, Coimbatore.

K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.

(svki) C.R.P.(P.D.) Nos.3327 and 3328 of 2016 26.10.2016 http://www.judis.nic.in