Vallarasu v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of IPC in Crime No.14 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that totally there are ten accused. Among the ten accused, nine were arrested, the petitioner herein is arrayed as A9. It is alleged that the petitioner and other accused persons went to the defacto complainant house, and threatened the defacto complainant and his family members and robbed gold jewelery, silver, utensils and a sum of Rs.30,000/-. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that there are two previous cases pending against the petitioner in similar

nature. He would further submit that the earlier application filed by the petitioner before this Court in Crl.O.P.No.12837 of 2022 and the same was dismissed on 09.06.2022 and hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the fact that this Court had dismissed the earlier application filed by the petitioner and that there is no change of circumstances. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 11.07.2022 Lpp

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Lpp 11.07.2022