← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10590/2004dismissed as infructuous

K.Ponnusamy Naicker & Sons, v. Corporation Of Chennai,

2017-07-21Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.10590 of 2004 K.Ponnusamy Naicker & Sons, Represented by its Managing Director, P.Selvaganesha Raja, No.72, Walltax Road, Chennai 600 079 .. Petitioner Vs.

1) Corporation of Chennai, Rep. by its Commissioner, Rippon Buildings, Chennai 600 003

2) The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai 600 003 .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the second respondent pertaining to his proceedings bearing No.L&E.D.C.No.LE4/19793/79 dated 11.12.2003 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider the renewal of lease in favour of the petitioner with regard to the land situated in premises bearing Door No.33 A, V.O.C.Nagar, Basin Bridge Road, Chennai 600 079 as in the case of other lessees similarly situated like the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mrs.R.T.Shymala For Respondents : Mr.C.Ravichandran for R1 & R2

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mrs.R.T.Shymala, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous and also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VI) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To:

The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai Rippon Buildings, Chennai 600 003 +1cc to Mr.C.Ravichandran,Advocate sr.51757 Order in W.P.No.10590 of 2004 ssI(co) ss(5/9/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/