← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/10918/2026granted

Govindaraj Alias Anand v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

2026-04-30Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.04.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.10918 of 2026

1. M.Govindaraj @ Anand

2. S.Karthik ... Petitioner(s) Vs.

State represented by the Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station, Coimbatore District.

Crime No.639 of 2025 ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of hi arrest in connection with Crime No.639 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.J.Franklin For Respondent(s) : Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506(1) of IPC in Crime No.639 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

1/6

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant, for the purpose of supply of yarn, approached the petitioners and paid a sum of Rs.41,91,385/-. However, the petitioners failed to supply the yarn as agreed. It is further alleged that, out of the said amount, the petitioners have returned only a sum of Rs.19,75,045/-, and the remaining amount is yet to be repaid. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is willing to repay the remaining amount and is also ready to deposit the same, and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of anticipatory, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has no bad antecedents.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the nature of the allegations, the fact that the petitioner has no bad antecedents, and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is 2/6

willing to deposit the remaining amount, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Annur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioner(s) fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioner(s) shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner(s) in accordance with law as if the 3/6

conditions have been imposed and the petitioner(s) released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the petitioner(s) thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.

30.04.2026 Jeni 4/6

To

1. The learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Annur

2. The Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station, Coimbatore District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 5/6

G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN , J.

Jeni Crl.O.P.No.10918 of 2026 30.04.2026 6/6