← Library
Madras High CourtWP/4239/2014disposed of

D.Srikanth v. The Commissioner

2018-09-27Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.4239 of 2014 and W.M.P.No.33544 of 2017 D.Srikanth .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment No.119, Mahatma Gandhi road Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

2.Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Dr.Balasundaram road Coimbatore-18.

3.The Executing Officer Arulmighu Rathnagiri Maruthachala Temple Saravanampatti Coimbatore.

.. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to consider the petitioner's representations dated 10.12.2013 and 06.01.2014 in accordance with law within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Edwin Prabakar For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Maharaja Special Govt. Pleader For R3 : Mr.R.Rajesh Prabakar

ORDER

The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider his representations dated 10.12.2013 and 06.01.2014 within the stipulated period of time.

2.According to the petitioner, he is working as a Priest in Arulmighu Rathnagiri Maruthachala Temple, Coimbatore. The petitioner has submitted the representations dated 10.12.2013 and 06.01.2014 to the respondents 1 and 2 claiming that he was prevented by the third respondent from performing rituals in the temple, but, the same are yet to be disposed of by the respondents 1 and 2. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 3.Though many grounds have been raised in this petition, which have been countered by the third respondent, the learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for disposal of the representations on merits. Mr.M.

Maharaja, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 as well as the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent have no serious objections for the same and submitted that the respondents 1 and 2 be directed to consider the petitioner's representations and pass orders in accordance with law. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.12.2013 and 06.01.2014 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. kj Sd/- Deputy Registrar // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar TO 1.The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment No.119, Mahatma Gandhi road Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

2.Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Dr.Balasundaram road Coimbatore-18.

3.The Executing Officer Arulmighu Rathnagiri Maruthachala Temple Saravanampatti, Coimbatore.

+ 1 CC TO MR.A.EDWIN PRABAKAR, ADVOCATE SR 66950 KR/11/10/18 W.P.No.4239 of 2014 and W.M.P.No.33544 of 2017