Madras High CourtSA/2007/2002dismissed for default

Rama v. Rukmani,W/O.Nataraja Chettiar,

2018-07-05Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 05.07.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.2007 of 2002

1. Rama

2. Kavitha (minor)

3. Uma (minor) (2 and 3 are represented by their mother Rama herein) ..Appellants/Respondents Vs.

1. Rukmani

2. Manickam

3. Jeyanthi

4. Subasri (minor) (4th respondent in rep. by her mother, 3rd Respondent Jeyanthi here) .. Respondents/Plaintiff PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and decree in A.S.No.12 of 2001 on the file of the Principal District Judge at Nagapattinam dated 06.07.2001, confirming the Judgment and decree of Principal Subordinate Judge, Mailaduthurai so far as items 2 and 3 described in the plaint schedule dated 11.12.2000 (by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai) in O.S.No.191 of 1999 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthu Kumar

JUDGMENT

In the previous hearing, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter has been posted today under the caption '' for dismissal ''.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Today also, no representation for the appellants. Appellant called absent. The learned counsel for the respondents is present. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vv To

1. The Principal District Judge, Nagapattinam.

2. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+ 1 cc to M/s. A. Muthukumar, Advocate Sr.43496 S.A.No.2007 of 2002 NRI(CO) EU(26/07/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/