v.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated :08.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.1284 of 2001 and CMP.No.854 of 2010 1.S. Natarajan 2.S. Ganesan 3.S.Lakshmanan ... Appellants Vs .
1.V.Sivagami 2.V.Palanisamy 3.V. Balakrishnan 4.V.Selvaraj ... Respondents Prayer :
The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the Judgment and Decree of the learned Principal District Judge, Erode in A.S.No.39 of 1999 dated 30.04.1999 preferred against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Bhavani in O.S.No.500 of 1996 dated 11.12.1998.
For Appellants : Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the respondents. Learned counsel for the appellants reported 'no instructions'. The appellants called absent. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
gv Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
To
1. The learned Principal District Judge,Erode.
2. The learned Subordinate Judge, Bhavani.
VGII(co) sm:22.6.2018 S.A.No.1284 of 2001 and CMP.No.854 of 2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/