Kishore v. State By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 397 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.453 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant/Vignesh is that due to financial dispute, the petitioner had abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, assaulted him with knife and also threatened him. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and due to previous enmity, a false complaint has been given against them. He would further submit that they have nothing to do with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that due to financial dispute, the petitioner had abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, assaulted him

with knife and also threatened him. He would further submit that there are seven previous cases pending against the petitioner during the year 2019 to 2023. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and perused the entire materials available on record including the First Information Report.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner has seven previous cases pending against him, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

15.06.2023 drl

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

drl 15.06.2023