Madras High CourtCRL OP/16121/2021dismissed

Dhinakaran@R.S.Reddy v. State By

2021-09-06Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Sixth day of September Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.16121 of 2021 DHINAKARAN @ R.S.REDDY [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, GUMMIDIPOONDI, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.6 OF 2021 For Petitioner : M/S.S.SASIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 506(II) IPC and Section 11(1) and 12 of POCSO Act, 2012 in Crime No.6 of 2021 on the file of the respondent seeks anticipatory bail.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is alleged to have forced the defacto complainant's daughter to have love affair with him. It is also alleged that the petitioner had threatened the victim girl with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint. 4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he seeks for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that this is the second anticipatory bail petition. Earlier this court had dismissed the anticipatory bail petition in Crl.O.P.No. 10913 of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2021 on 06.07.2021 on the ground that there is serious allegations levelled against him. He further submitted that there is no change of circumstances and hence, vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Taking into consideration the antecedents of the petitioner and this Court had dismissed the earlier application filed by the petitioner and also that there is no change of circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 06/09/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, GUMMIDIPOONDI, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.S.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.16121/2021 Date :06/09/2021 JPA 22/09/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/