← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/2158/2025dismissed

Marg Ltd v. Sushil Lalwani

2025-06-09Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.06.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI MARG Limited, Represented by R.B. Srinivasan, CFO, having office at 57/2B Saisubhodhya Apartments, ECR, Tiruvanmyur, Chennai 600 041.

Petitioner(s) Vs 1.Mr.Sushil Lalwani S/o.Prakash Lalwani 2.M/s.Revanza Leasing India Private Limited, by its Director Aarthi Lalwani 3.M/s.Diya Office India Private Limited by its Director Aarthi Lalwani 4.M/s.Ridhi Office India Private Limited, by its Director Aarthi Lalwani 5.M/s.Mishri Business Solution Private Limited, by its Director Aarthi Lalwani.

6.M/s.Nirmala Business Solution Private Limited, by its Director Aarthi Lalwani 7.M/s.Revanza Kings Vadapalani Private Limited, by its Director Aarthi Lalwani 8.M/s.Aarthi Office Solutions Private Limited by its Director Aarthi Lalwani 9.M/s.Dhruv Office Solution Private Limited, by its Director Aarthi Lalwani 10.M/s.Susil Infra-Developers Private Limited, 1/4

by its Director Aarthi Lalwani All 1 to 10 having office at 23 EVR Salai, PH Road, Periamet, Chennai 600 003.

Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off the plaint in O.S. No.40 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Sholinganallur.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Jagannathan Mr.P.Chandrasekar for Caveators.

**********

ORDER

This petition is filed to strike off the plaint in O.S. No.40 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Sholinganallur.

2. Heard Mr.K.Jagannathan, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. It is brought to my notice that the petitioner has also taken out an Application in I.A. No.9 of 2025 in O.S. No.40 of 2025 to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. In view of the said attempt having been made by the petitioner to reject the plaint and the same is also pending before the Trial Court, I do not deem it proper to take up the revision to strike off the plaint. Accordingly, this 2/4

Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Liberty is granted to the revision petitioner to work out his remedy before the Trial Court viz., the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur in the I.A. No.9 of 2025 in O.S. No.40 of 2025 filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. No costs.

09.06.2025 rkp Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No To:

The Principal District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur.

3/4

P.B.BALAJI, J., rkp CRP. PD. No .2158 of 2025 09.06.2025 4/4