Chidambaram v. J.A. Thangavel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.02.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA CRP.(PD).No.14 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 Chidambaram ... Petitioner Vs.

1.J.A. Thangavel 2.Ganagambal 3.K.A. Venkatesan 4.Sundalrarajan Chinnamma (deceased) Madeswaran (deceased) 5.Sivalingam 6.Rajendran 7.Sambath 8.Senthilkumar 9.Srinivasan 10.Sudha 11.Gururajan 1/5

12.Selvan 13.Palanisamy 14.Rajeswari 15.Rasu @ Subramaniam 16.Balu 17.State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By Its District Collector, Erode, Erode District.

18.The Tahsildar Bhavani Taluk, Erode District.

19.Loanathan 20.Paramasivam 21.Jagannathan 22.Bhuvaneswari 23.Minor Sathesh

24. Minor Nirmal Kumar Minor respondents 23 & 24 Rep. By Their Mother /Bhuvaneswari 25.Mrs. Vijayalakshmi 26.Mrs. Padmavathy 27.Mrs. Sulochana ... Respondents 2/5

Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records relating to the Fair and Decreetal orders made in I.A.No.164 of 2011 in O.S.No.222 of 2006 dated 27.06.2013 on the file of the First Additional District Munsif Court at Bhavani and set aside the same and allow the Revision Petition. For Petitioner : M/s.K.Premkumar For Respondents : M/s.B.Mohan for R.1 and R.2 : R.3, R5 to R16, R19, R20, R26 & R27 - Dismissed vide order dated 17.08.2015.

: R.4, R17, R18, R21 to R25 - Ex parte vide in CB

O R D E R

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the Fair and Decreetal orders made in I.A.No.164 of 2011 in O.S.No.222 of 2006 dated 27.06.2013 on the file of the First Additional District Munsif Court at Bhavani and set aside the same.

2. Heard the learned counsels on either side.

3. Considering the fact that pursuant to the orders passed in I.A.No.164/2011, the Advocate Commissioner had already submitted his 3/5

report which is fairly conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner, no further orders are required in the above Civil Revision Petition. It is open to the petitioner to submit objections, if any, to the Advocate Commissioner's Report.

4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

03.02.2025 (shr) Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No To 1.The First Additional District Munsif Court at Bhavani.

2. The District Collector, Erode, Erode District.

3.The Tahsildar Bhavani Taluk, Erode District.

4/5

P.T. ASHA . J., (shr) CRP.(PD).No.14 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 03.02.2025 5/5