Senthamil Selvi v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 02.11.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.R.C.366 of 2014 Senthamil Selvi

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. State rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police, Muthandi Kuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

(Cr.No.261/2008)

2. P.Settu

...Respondents

Prayer:

This Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of acquittal dated 29.10.2013 made in C.C.No.95 of 2010 by the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Panrutti.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gandhikumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1

ORDER

The criminal revision has been filed against the judgment of acquittal dated 29.10.2013 made in C.C.No.95 of 2010 by the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Panrutti. The defacto complainant has preferred the present revision against the order of acquittal. In view of the amendment dated 31.12.2009, appeal only lies before the Court of sessions, against the order of acquittal impugned in this revision. Hence the petitioner is directed to file an appeal before appropriate forum.

With the above direction, the criminal revision is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate forum. The period spent in this revision shall be exempted for the purpose of calculation of limitation.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS ) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

cgi To

1. The Judicial Magistrate I, Panrutti.

2.do thro the chief Judicial Magistrate, cuddalore 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Muthandi Kuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

4. The section officer,criminal Section, High court Madras

5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court , Madras.

+1cc to Mr.K.Gandhikumar , Advocate SR.No. 75822 Crl.R.C.366 of 2014 ASK(12/12/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/