Priyadarshini Samuel v. The Official Liquidator

Comp.A.No.241 of 2022 in C.P.No.73 of 2000 Comp.A.No.241 of 2022 in C.P.No.73 of 2000 M.SUNDAR, J., Captioned application has been filed for 'Condonation of Delay' ['COD'].

2. COD prayer is qua delay in filing claim petition in Form No.66.

3. Ms.B.Raji, learned counsel for applicant adverting to support affidavit submits that the applicant did not know the date of the winding up of the company and therefore, could not file the claim petition in time.

4. Mr.Bavisetty Sridhar, learned 'Deputy Official Liquidator' [hereinafter 'Deputy OL' for the sake of convenience and clarity] who is before this Court on behalf of 'Official Liquidator attached to this Court' [hereinafter 'OL' for the sake of convenience and clarity] submits that he has no serious objection or opposition to this COD prayer. Page No:1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Comp.A.No.241 of 2022 in C.P.No.73 of 2000 M.SUNDAR, J., vvk

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, COD prayer is acceded to i.e., captioned application is ordered as prayed for and delay is condoned albeit subject to condition that the applicant should file Form No.66 before OL along with original deposit receipt/certificate within a fortnight from today i.e., on or before 29.07.2022 failing which the captioned application will stand dismissed without reference to this Court.

6. Captioned application ordered on the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

15.07.2022 vvk Comp.A.No.241 of 2022 in C.P.No.73 of 2000 Page No:2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis