Sithi Fathima Sultan Beevi v. S.Kirubananthan(Decs)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN A.S.No.698 of 2014 Sithi Fathima Sultan Beevi ... Appellant/Plaintiff -vs1.S.Inbasekar 2.S.Bhuvaneswaran 3.S.Usha Rani ... Respondents/Defendants 2 to4 PRAYER: First Appeal is filed under Section 96 r/w Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.9261 of 2010 dated 04.03.2014 on the file of the XVIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.Prabhu Ram (No appearance)

O R D E R

[The case was heard through video conferencing] When this appeal came up for hearing on 02.11.2021, only the learned counsel for the respondents alone present and there is no representation for the learned counsel for the appellant and hence, the Registry was directed to print the name of the appellant in the cause-list and post this matter today under the caption, "for dismissal" and accordingly, it is listed today.

2. Even today i.e., on 08.11.2021, inspite of the name of the appellant being printed in the cause-list, there is no https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

representation for the appellant. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gv To:

1. The Judge, The XVIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

A.S.No.698 of 2014 PA(CO) SU(30/11/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/