M.Ramdev v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.09.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.No.15044 of 2021

1. M. Ramdev

2. M. Jayadev

3. M. John

4. V. Gnanasoundari

5. M.Mariyal Masilamani

6. M. Henapriyadharshini ... Petitioners

Versus

1.State represented by, Inspector of Police, H-6, R.K.Nagar Police Station, Chennai.

2. Thulasi ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.1323 of 2018 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent police, quash the same based on the compromise arrived at between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant.

Page No.1 of 5

For Petitioner :

Mr. J. Prakash For Respondents :

Mr.A.Damodaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 : Mr. K. Kannan, for Mr. A.Balamurugan for R2

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.1323 of 2018, dated 23.12.2018 on the file of the 1st respondent Police.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 23.12.2018, due to property dispute, the petitioners picked quarrel with the relatives of the defacto complainant. When the defacto complainant questioned the same, the petitioners said to have assaulted thel defacto complainant and her relatives with hands and wooden logs and also threated them with dire consequences. Hence, she lodged a complaint before the 1st respondent police. On receipt of the same, a case in Crime No.1323 of 2018 was registered on the same day for the offencecs under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 294(b), 323, 427 and 506(ii) of IPC. Page No.2 of 5

3.The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromised the dispute amicably among themselves.

4. The defacto complainant have filed an affidavit of compromise, dated 16.08.2021 to that effect. The petitioners and the 2nd respondent are present through Video conferencing. In the joint affidavit of compromise, it is stated that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are neighbours and they decided to settle the issue between them amicably, now compromised and the defacto complainant is not inclined to proceed with the investigation further. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

5.Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641Page No.3 of 5

(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), and after exercising due caution as advised by the Hon'ble Suprme Court in The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar and Another reported in (2019) 2 MLJ Crl 10), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., quashes the First Information Report in Crime No.1323 of 2018, on the file of the 1st respondent Police. 6.This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the investigation in Crime No.1323 of 2018, on the file of the 1st respondent police, is quashed as against the petitioners. 01.09.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No mrp To

1. Inspector of Police, H-6, R.K.Nagar Police Station, Chennai.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page No.4 of 5

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

mrp CRL.O.P.No.15044 of 2021 01.09.2021 Page No.5 of 5