← Library
Madras High CourtWP/15515/2020disposed of

S.Ponnusamy v. The District Collector

2020-11-09Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Date : 09.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.15515 of 2020 S.Ponnusamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem - 636 001.

2. The Tahsildar, Salem Taluk,

3. The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., No.12, Ramakrishna Road, ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent, the District Collector, Salem and 2nd Respondent, the Tahsildar, Salem to recover the amount as per the certificate issued on 03.02.2020 by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Salem as on date and to remit the same as per the certificate apart from any other damages for the sufferings caused to me by negligent act of the 3rd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Pichappa For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs.R.J.Radhika Government Advocate

ORDER

The prayer sought for herein is for a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent, the District Collector, Salem and the second respondent, the Tahsildar, Salem to recover the amount, as per the certificate issued on 03.02.2020 by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Salem as on date and to remit the same as per the certificate apart from any other damages for the sufferings caused to the petitioner by negligent act of the third respondent.

2.The petitioner was serving as an employee at the third respondent Transport Corporation and lastly he was serving as

Checking Inspector and on superannuation, he retired from service on 30.09.2013. The petitioner, before retirement, has rendered unblemished service for 32 years to the said Transport Corporation and therefore, after retirement, since he is entitled to get the gratuity under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, the same should have been paid within 30 days from the retirement, which was not paid to the petitioner, since he has filed P.G.Case No.06 of 2016 in the year 2016, where, a direction was given to the third respondent to pay the gratuity amount of Rs.6,53,834/- to the petitioner. Out of the said amount, only a sum of Rs.5,12,180/- was paid on 23.05.2017 and further a sum of Rs.1,07,558/- was paid on 16.08.2018. 3.After making all these payments, still there is a due to the extent of Rs.

1,51,740/-, by calculating the remaining due payable by the third respondent to the petitioner as gratuity with interest of 10% per annum, as allowed by the Gratuity Authority and in order to recover the said amount, since the petitioner had approached the Labour Commissioner concerned, who, on considering the request of the petitioner, has passed an order dated 03.02.2020 in Na.Ka.No.B4/3790/2019 addressed to the first respondent District Collector to invoke the provision under RR Act i.e. Revenue Recovery Act for recovery of the said sum of Rs.1,51,740/- from the third respondent and deposit the same on the PG account at the Labour Commissioner office. 4.

Since the said request made by the Labour Commissioner to the first respondent District Collector has not been considered and no action since have been taken by the District Collector, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition with aforesaid prayer.

5.Heard Mr.T.Pichappa, learned counsel for the petitioner, who would reiterate that, in view of the said communication dated 03.02.2020, it is a duty on the part of the first respondent to initiate the revenue recovery proceedings, which the said authority since has failed to do, a direction to that effect can be issued, therefore, the mandamus as sought for can be considered, he contended.

6.On the other hand, Mrs.R.J.Rathika, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, on instruction would submit that, the said request made by the Labour Commissioner, in Na.Ka.No.B4/3790/2019 dated 03.02.2020, would certainly be considered by the first respondent and in this regard, necessary direction would be given to the second respondent to recover the said amount of gratuity payable by the third respondent to the petitioner within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court and accordingly, the said amount of recovery would be deposited in the said account of the Labour Commissioner.

7.I have considered the said submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and I have perused the materials placed before this Court.

8.As has been rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, though the Labour Commissioner has sent a communication in Na.Ka.No.B4/3790/2019 dated 03.02.2020 to the first respondent District Collector for invocation of the provisions under Revenue Recovery Act for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,51,740/- towards the remaining balance of the gratuity payable to the petitioner from the third respondent, the said request since have not been considered, rightly the petitioner has approached this Court, therefore, by taking into account the present stand taken by the first and second respondents, as projected by the learned Government Advocate appearing for them, this Court feel that, this writ petition can be disposed of by passing the following orders.

The first and second respondents are hereby directed to act upon, as per the request made by the Labour Commissioner, Salem, who is the controlling authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, by his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.B4/3790/2019 dated 03.02.2020 and accordingly, by invoking the provisions of Revenue Recovery Act, the due payable by the third respondent to the petitioner towards the remaining balance of the gratuity to the extent of Rs.1,51,740/- shall be recovered and be deposited, as directed by the Labour Commissioner in the PG account and the needful, as has been indicated above, shall be undertaken by the first and second respondents within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With these direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem - 636 001.

2. The Tahsildar, Salem Taluk,

3. The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., No.12, Ramakrishna Road, +1cc to Mr.R.Dillikumar, Advocate, S.R.No.36435 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.36722 W.P.No.15515 of 2020 UM(CO) RV(06/01/2021)