J.Jayachandran v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.06.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P No.15720 of 2019 J.Jayachandran

...Petitioner

vs.

State Rep by, Inspector of Police, Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai - 600 100

...Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry for which already he has appeared and given explanation along with Bank Statements. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balu For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The grievance of the petitioner is that there is a money dispute between the parties and the respondent police is issuing summons under Section 91 & 160 of Cr.PC for appearance of the petitioners even without registering an FIR and therefore, the summon itself is not sustainable.

2.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the respondent police will take a decision with regard to registration of FIR within a short time, if the complaint makes out a cognizable offence and thereafter, will proceed in accordance with law.

3.

Recording the submissions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar jas/ub https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai - 600 100 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.V.Balu, Advocate, S.R.No.53727 Crl.O.P No.15720 of 2019 VBA(CO) RRS(17/07/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/