E.Perumal v. The Superintendent Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.07.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.17481 of 2019 E.Perumal ... Petitioner -VsThe Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District.

The Inspector of Police (Law and Order), B-3, Taluk Police Station, Kancheepuram.

... Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ by directing the 1st respondent to remove his name from the History Sheet List which was opened on 06.04.2012 in History Sheet List No.05 of 2012.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathish Rajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the first respondent to remove the name of the petitioner from the history sheet list maintained by the second respondent.

2. The second respondent has opened history sheet list No.5 of 2012, against the petitioner. The following are the particulars of the cases registered against the petitioner and the stage of the case.

Sl.N o.

Name of the PS Cr.No.and Sec. of Law Stage of the case B3 PS Cr.No.798/1998 307,302, 379 IPC @ 392 IPC r/w.397, 394, 302, 201 of IPC Acquitted B3 PS Cr.No.977/2006 4(1-A) TNP Act Acquitted 3.

Dusi PS Cr.No.127/2000 147, 148, 323, 451, 307 IPC P.T 4.

B3 PS Cr.No.200/2008 147, 341, 506(ii) of IPC r/w 3(i) (x) of SC/ST (POA) Act 1985 MF Dated 21.04.200 5.

Dusi PS.Cr.No.616/2009 147, 148 of IPC r/w 25(i) Indian Arms Act Acquitted 6.

Tiruppathi Traffic Investigation Cr.No.83/08 279, 304(A) of IPC Acquitted 7.

B2 PS Cr.No.1850/2012 29(b) IPC P.T

3. The petitioner has given a representation dated 29.01.2019 to the respondents requesting them to remove the name of the petitioner from the history sheet. Since no action has been taken on the representation, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court, seeking for appropriate directions.

4. Heard, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.

5. Taking into consideration, the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation dated 29.01.2019 made by the petitioner in accordance with the guidelines given by this Court in Sabari @ sabarigiri Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Annanagar (L and O) Range, Madurai City, Madurai and others, reported in 2018 (4MLJ) Criminal page 585 and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ub

To The Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District.

The Inspector of Police (Law and Order), B-3, Taluk Police Station, Kancheepuram.

3.

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.S.Sathish Rajan, Advocate, S.R.No.57522 W.P.No.17481 of 2019 RJI(CO) CS/14/08/2019