← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18843/2026disposed of

Shaheen Shaw v. The Secretary / Managing Director

2026-06-01Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Shaffiq5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Shaheen Shaw, S/o.Habeebullah, D.No.325, Srinivasapuram, Pattinambakkam (Backside of Mosque) Chennai - 600 028.

..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Secretary / Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5 Kamarajar Salai, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Chennai.

3.The Tahsildar, Mylapore Taluk, Chennai District.

4.The Estate Officer, Estate Office No.9 Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Okkiyam Thoraipakkam, Kannagi Nagar, Chennai - 600 097.

..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to allot a free house to the petitioner under the Emergency Tsunami Rehabilitation Programme or under the Housing Scheme for Differently Abled Persons by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 31.03.2026.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondent(s):

Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar for R1 Mr.S.Karthikeyan Standing Counsel for R2

ORDER

The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, seeking a direction to the respondents to allot a free house to petitioner under the Emergency Tsunami Rehabilitation Programme or under the Housing Scheme for Differently Abled Persons, by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 31.03.2026.

2. Heard Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent. Mr.S.Karthikeyan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3. At the outset, learned Standing Counsel for second respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 31.03.2026 would be considered by the second respondent in accordance with law, within a time period to be fixed by this Court.

3. In view of the above, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited relief sought for in this Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to second respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 31.03.2026, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioner and any other interested persons, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the representation and it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the representation on its own merits and in accordance with law.

4. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

01-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ANU

To 1.The Secretary / Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5 Kamarajar Salai, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Chennai.

3.The Tahsildar, Mylapore Taluk, Chennai District.

4.The Estate Officer, Estate Office No.9 Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Okkiyam Thoraipakkam, Kannagi Nagar, Chennai - 600 097.

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

ANU 01-06-2026