Mr.Arulraj, v. The State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.06.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.OP No.7792 of 2015 Arulraj .. Petitioner Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Peerkankaranai Police Station Perungalathur, Chennai 600 063 .. Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner.

For petitioner :Mr.C.Balasundar For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking for a direction to the respondent police not to harass him.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

3. It is represented by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent that on the complaint given by one Balamurugan, the petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R.No.177 of 2015 against the petitioner.

4. In my considered opinion, no blanket direction as prayed for by the petitioner can be given. If the petitioner is wanted either for enquiry or for interrogation, he can very well be summoned by the respondent police and while doing so, the petitioner shall not be harassed. At the same time, the petitioner should submit himself to the respondent for interrogation and enquiry.

5. With the above observation, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Inspector of Police, Peerkankaranai Police Station Perungalathur Chennai 600 063 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

1 cc to Mr.G. Justin, Advocate Sr.26404 Crl.OP No.7792 of 2015 SAI(CO) Eu 09.06.15 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/