G.Rajeev @ Raj v. The State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Fourth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.15110 of 2021 G.RAJEEV @ RAJ [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEEDAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.515/2021) For Petitioner : M/S S.C.VISHWANTH Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 379 of IPC r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Cr.No.515 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was involved in illegal transportation of one unit of river sand and he was escaped on seeing police officials. Hence the case was lodged by the defacto-complainant against the petitioner. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence prays for grant of anticipatory bail.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner was involved in illegal transportation of river sand through TATA 407 van. Hence he strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case that since the the petitioner was in illegal transportation of river sand, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition seeking anticipatory bail is dismissed.
-sd/- 24/08/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEEDAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S S.C.VISHWANTH Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.15110/2021 Date :24/08/2021 INBA 06/09/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/