R.Radhakrishnan v. K.Anusuya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.12.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(NPD) No.3806 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.19449 of 2016 R.Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs.

K.Anusuya rep by her Power Agent A.K.Ramesh ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 21.09.2016 made in M.P.No.12 of 2016 in R.C.O.P.No.15 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ambattur.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prakash

O R D E R

The order passed by the Rent Controller/District Munsif, Ambattur in M.P.No.12 of 2016 in R.C.O.P.No.15 of 1999 has been challenged by the tenant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by way of a revision. 2.Under Section 23 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, any person aggrieved by an order passed by the Controller,

M.DURAISWAMY,J.

va may, within 15 days from the date of such order prefer an appeal in writing to the Appellate Authority having jurisdiction. 3.Admittedly, the impugned order has been passed by the Rent Controller. In such circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition filed by the tenant challenging the said order is not maintainable. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is rejected. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Index : No 02.12.2016 Internet : Yes va Note: (i) Issue order copy today itself.

(ii) Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the fair and decreetal order passed in M.P.No.12 of 2016 in R.C.O.P.No.15 of 1999 to the counsel for the petitioner.

To 1.The District Munsif Court, Ambattur C.R.P.(NPD).No.3806 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.19449 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in