V.Kannan v. Mrs.Vijaya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.06.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE CRP (PD) Nos.1598 & 1599 of 2014 & M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2014 1.V.Kannan 2.S.Jeeva Ratnam ...

Petitioners in both C.R.Ps.

Vs 1.Vijaya 2.D.Thirunavukarasu 3.T.Nirmal Kummar 4.T.Magesh Kumar 5.T.Supriya 6.R.Kalpana 7.Sarada Devi 8.R.Sandeep Kumar 9.V.Jayamoorty 10.R.Sreedher ... Respondents in both C.R.Ps.

Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 06.03.2014 passed in C.M.A.No.160 of 2013 in I.A.Nos.14287 & 14288 of 2013 in O.S.No.5317 of 2013 on the file of the learned VII Additional City Civil Court at Chennai.

For Petitioners in both C.R.Ps.

: Mr.D.Senthil Kumar For Respondent 1 in both C.R.Ps.

: Mr.S.Natana Rajan For Respondents 2 to 10 in both C.R.Ps. Given up COMMON ORDER The instant revisions are listed under the caption "for dismissal". Even though the matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks further adjournment to argue the matter. Even on 10.06.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioners and on the next hearing date i.e., on 11.06.2019, the learned counsel for the petitioners entered appearance and sought for an adjournment and only at his request, it has been posted today under the caption "for dismissal". Once again, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks further adjournment to argue the matter. It can now be inferred that the petitioners are not interested in these civil revision petitions. Accordingly, the instant Civil Revision

Petitions are dismissed as non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 21.06.2019 Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order nl To The VII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

nl CRP (PD) Nos.1598 & 1599 of 2014 & M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2014 21.06.2019