Parimala v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.06.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Parimala ...

Petitioner versus 1.The State rep. by The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Perambalur District.

2.The District Sub-Registrar, District Sub-Registrar Office, Perambalur District.

...

Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.03.2024. For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondents :

Mr.B.Vijay Additional Government Pleader 1/4

O R D E R

By consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

2.

This Writ Petition is filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.03.2024. 3.

The very representation indicates that there is a dispute between the mother-in-law and daughter-in-law with regard to the right over the property. Therefore, such rights cannot be decided by the Sub-Registrar. It is for the petitioner to establish the right in the appropriate forum. 4.

With the above observations, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

28.06.2024 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No sri 2/4

To 1.The District Registrar, Government of Tamil Nadu, District Registrar Office, Perambalur District.

2.The District Sub-Registrar, District Sub-Registrar Office, Perambalur District.

3/4

N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.

sri 28.06.2024 4/4