Mrs.Sahnthi, v. The Chief Educational Officer,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.06.2022 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.6586 of 2014 and M.P.No.2 of 2014 & W.M.P.No.14128 of 2016 Shanthi ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Chief Educational Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal.
2. The District Educational Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal.
3. The Correspondent Sankar Higher Secondary School Sankari West, Namakkal District.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Notice of the 3rd respondent dated 25.02.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as B.Ed. Graduate Teacher in the 3rd respondent School. For Petitioner : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Bindram Additional Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.Vishnu Mohan For Mr.R.Parthasarathy
ORDER
The notification issued by the 3rd respondent School, inviting applications from eligible candidates for appointment to the post of B.T. Assistant (English), is under challenge in the present writ petition.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2.Admittedly, the writ petitioner is working as a Secondary Grade Teacher in the 3rd respondent School and she possesses requisite qualification for appointment to the post of B.T. Assistant (Social Studies). However, the impugned notification was issued for appointment to the post of B.T. Assistant (English) and that apart, the notification was issued in the year 2014 and after a lapse of 8 years, now, at this length of time, the notification cannot be interfered with by this Court. 3.The learned counsel appearing for 3rd respondent School brought to the notice of this Court that, pursuant to the interim stay granted in the present writ petition, the notification was not acted upon and no one was selected for appointment to the post of B.T. Assistant. By efflux of time and on account of reduction of students' strength, the post of B.T.
Assistant is not required in the 3rd respondent School and thus, the Management has not initiated any action. 4.This being the factum, no further consideration is required in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Jeni/Mkn To
1. The Chief Educational Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal.
2. The District Educational Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal.
+1cc to Mr.R.Parthasarathy, Advocate, S.R.No.33994 +1cc to Mr.C.K.M.Appaji, Advocate, S.R.No.33450 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.34228 W.P.No.6586 of 2014 SMI[co] NSK/16/06/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/