V.Rajamani, v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.03.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.42751 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.36673 of 2016 V.Rajamani ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Mel Chengam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

3.K.Rashiya 4.V.Thirupathi ... Respondents Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from interfering with the civil disputes in respect of the properties situated in Survey Nos.62/2A - 0.03.5, 62/2B - 0.03.0, 62/2C-0.02.5, 62/6A-0.05, 62/6B-0.09.5, 62/6C-0.06.5, 62/6D-0.03.0, 62/6E1-0.13.0, 62/6E20.13.0, 62/4A1-0.00.5, 62/4A2-0.04.0, Old S.No.62/5 , New Survey No.62/5A1 well situated in this S.No.with 1/4th well water right, S.No.62/10A-0.11.5, 62/10B-0.03.0, 62/10C-0.03.0, 62/10D-0.03.0, well situated in Old S.No.62/5, New S.No.62/5A1 in this 1/3rd well water right. S.No.62/1A-0.04.0, 62/1B-0.03.0, 62/1C-0.03.0, 62/4B1-0.01.0, 62-4B2-0.03.0, 62/5A2-0.13.5, 62/5C-0.03.5, 62/90.14.5, 62/11-0.04.5, 62/3A-0.01.0, 62/3B-0.20.

0 totally to an extent of 1.38.4 hectares and another property situated in Survey No.62/6E1 to an extent of 0.37 cents, S.No.62/6E2 - 0.37 cents at Kattamadavu Village, Chenagam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District pending in between the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4 in S.A.No.327 and 346 of 2008 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajesh Kanna For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz For R1 & R2 Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.A.Srinivasan for R3 & R4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed to forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the complaint had lodged by the petitioner in C.S.R.No.245 of 2016 and the second respondent Inspector of Police has conducted an enquiry and closed the complaint on 11.10.2016. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.

3. Considering the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructous. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vkr/msm To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Mel Chengam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.A.Rajesh Kanna, Advocate SR.No.19488 W.P.No.42751 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.36673 of 2016 VD(CO) GMY(10/04/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/