Kamals Roshan v. Hemalatha

Rev.Appl.No.210 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.07.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN Review Application No.210 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.15873 of 2024 Kamals Roshans ....

Petitioner -Vs1.Hemalatha 2.H.Lalith Kumar Surana 3.Anumamal Sowcar 4.Semalkar 4.Vasantha Bai ....

Respondents Prayer : Review Application under Order XLVII Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 114 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 18.04.2024 in C.R.P.No.1660 of 2024.

For Petitioner : Ms.Preethi Basker

O R D E R

The petitioner is an agreement holder. He does not have any interest in the immovable property. It was on that ground that the revision was dismissed on 18.04.2024.

2. Ms.Preethi Basker would submit that the first respondent Hemalatha had entered into an agreement with third parties after she had entered into an agreement 1 / 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Rev.Appl.No.210 of 2024 V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

KST with the review petitioner and therefore she has lodged a criminal complaint before the District Munsif Court-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Thiruporur. She would plead that the matter may be referred to mediation so that she will be in a position to recover some investment that has been made by her with the first respondent.

3. Being an offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, which is compoundable, the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Thiruporur is requested to broach the idea of settlement through mediation in C.C.No.60 of 2024. No ground for review of the order dated 18.04.2024 in CRP No.1660 of 2024 is made out. The Review Application is dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

25.07.2024 Index : Yes/No KST To The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Thiruporur.

Rev.Appl.No.210 of 2024 2 / 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis