A.Subashni v. The State Rep By

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

Today the matter is listed under the caption "for reporting compliance".

2. When the matter was taken up, both counsels appeared and submitted that, as per the Joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 06.07.2024, a sum of Rs. 2,04,50,000/- was paid by the petitioner and his son, who were ranked as A3 and A4, and this amount was received by the de facto complainant.

3. The learned counsel for the intervenor submitted that they have received the amount as per the terms of the Joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 06.07.2024.

4. Considering this, the interim bail already granted by this Court dated 19.06.2024 is made absolute. The Joint Memorandum of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this order.

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

rri

5. Now that the amount has been settled by A3 and A4 and the same has been accepted by the de facto complainant. On earlier occasion the trial Court had issued NBW against A3 alone.

6. Since the matter was settled between A3, A4, and the de facto complainant, the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued by the learned trial judge against A3 is declared as non-est. Furthermore, the defacto complainant's lack of inclination to proceed against A3 and A4 is also recorded. Therefore, the respondent police are directed not to take any further action against them, since the issue with the de facto complainant was settled based on the Joint Memorandum of Compromise.

16.07.2024 rri