Axel Jean De Locht v. Tamil Nadu State Womens

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.03.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN and WMP No.20011 of 2018 Axel Jean De Locht, 21B Subba Rao Avenue, Palavakkam,Chennai 600 041 ...

Petitioner Vs

1. Tamil Nadu State Women's Commission, represented by its Chairperson, MLA Building, 2nd floor, 735, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

2. BNP Paribas India Solutions Private Limited, Zenith Building, 11th Floor, International Technology Park, Ascendas, CSIR, Taramani, Chennai 600 113.

3. Mrs. Archana Yallajosula, 3F, Doshi Apartment, No.1, East Mada Street, Sri Nagar Colony, Little Mount, Chennai 600 015 ...

Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondent no.1 from proceedings 1/4

any further in regard to proceedings NO.1416/2018 under the cover fo the Tamil Nadu State Women's Commission Act, 2008 in regard to any issues covered by the order of dismissal issued by respondent no.2 dated 23.04.2018 issued to respondent no.3 in regard to and arising out of show cause notice dated 13.11.2017 where the allegations of misconduct and falsification of taxi receipts etc., were made against respondent no.3 that resulted in the domestic enquiry that found respondent no.3 guilty, leading to order of dismissal dated 23.04.2018, which was the subject matter of the proceedings before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation)-3, Chennai resulting in advice dated 14.05.2018. For petitioner ...

Mr. Sanjay Mohan for Mr. Shardul Amarchand Managaldas & Co., For respondents ...

Mr. V.Jayaprakash Narayanan for R1 ... Mr. Janani Shankar, for R2 ...

Mr. V.Ajay Khose, for R3

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed restraining the first respondent from conducting further enquiry based on the complaint given by the 3rd respondent.

2/4

2. Today , when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. AjayKhose, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent, on instructions, submitted that now the 3rd respondent is not interested to proceed further with the complaint filed against the petitioner herein and hence, the first respondent may be directed not to proceed with the enquiry.

3. Considering the above submission, the first respondent is directed not to proceed with the complaint filed by the 3rd respondent against the petitioner and hence, this Writ Petition is closed as no further adjudication is required in this matter. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

08.03.2022 Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order mrp To The Chairperson, Tamil Nadu State Women's Commission, MLA Building, 2nd floor, 735, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

3/4

V. BHARATHIDASAN, J.

mrp 08.03.2022 4/4